Q&A with Dr Sipho Senabe

Fires at Tembisa Hospital have again raised concerns about fire and safety protocols at hospitals in Gauteng. Chris Barron asked Dr Sipho Senabe, chief director of occupational health & safety in the province's department of health ...

Dr Sipho Senabe
Dr Sipho Senabe (DPSA)

 

Q:Why are so many of your hospitals not compliant with fire and safety requirements?

A:Our biggest challenge is fire suppression equipment, which is a design issue.

Q:Not a management issue?

A:It’s a design issue. It’s a function of when these hospitals were constructed. A majority were constructed when many of these townships were established. They were designed when fire suppression equipment was not installed as a design area.

Q:Are you saying your hospitals have fire suppression equipment that’s not fit for purpose?

A:No. Facilities in some of our newer areas would have this equipment, but in the old hospitals we don’t have that.

Q:So these hospitals are sitting with essential equipment that is not fit for purpose?

A:No. Equipment that requires engineering installation, like where there are sprinklers and detectors, we have been incrementally installing.

Q:But not at Tembisa Hospital?

A:Not at Tembisa. All these old township facilities have the same problem.

Q:Meaning they’re not compliant with fire and safety requirements?

A:They’re at different stages.

Q:Isn’t full compliance a statutory requirement in terms of the Occupational Health and Safety Act?

A:The OHSA gives certain principles to guide the compliance of employers. The first principle is the reasonable person’s test. So, what would a reasonable CEO do when they do not have fire suppression equipment? Most of our hospitals have fire extinguishers.

Q:Doesn’t the OHSA oblige you to be 100% compliant with the requirement for fire suppression equipment?

A:Your 100% is not even a requirement at an international level. We have committed ourselves to 90%. None of our facilities is less than 75%.

Q:Don’t two fires at Tembisa Hospital in four days suggest that their fire and safety measures are not fit for purpose?

A:That question will be answered by the law enforcement agencies, Ekurhuleni fire department and the department of employment & labour’s inspections. But we can tell you that X-rays and other areas have been cleared.

Q:What about the accident and emergency and outpatient units?

A:The accident and emergency we cannot access at all. We have to have structural engineers to fix that place and tell us it is safe; we must have electrical engineers. All that is going to take some time.

Q:Years, surely, if you look at Charlotte Maxeke?

A:Charlotte Maxeke is 100% functional.

Q:After how many years?

A:Point taken. It took longer than anticipated, but we’ve learnt lessons.

Q:Shouldn’t you have learnt the importance of having proper fire prevention equipment at your hospitals?

A:The Charlotte Maxeke situation cannot apply here.

Q:Shouldn’t it have been a wake-up call for you?

A:Yes, and we have actually learnt lessons from Charlotte Maxeke.

Q:So how is it that four years later another of your hospitals is critically damaged by not just one but two fires?

A:After the investigations we can answer this question more precisely.

Q:When last was there a comprehensive assessment of fire and safety protocols at your hospitals?

A:The 15th of every month we get a comprehensive report from each of our hospitals.

Q:And a week later Tembisa goes up in flames?

A:No law, no science, expects our hospitals to be 100% compliant.


Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon